While I'm relieved that the Malaysian government has stopped the bridge talks with Singapore and directly crossed out the possibility of Malaysia acceding to unacceptable Singaporean demands, I'm extremely disappointed with the Malaysian government's decision to cancel the bridge altogether (tag). I found it out through TV3. Bernama has more:

KUALA LUMPUR, April 12 (Bernama) -- The government has decided to stop the construction of the bridge to replace the Johor Causeway that links Malaysia and Singapore, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi announced Wednesday.

He said the government had also decided to stop all negotiations pertaining to the bridge. Construction of the bridge, also known as the "scenic bridge" began early this year, to replace half of the Johor Causeway on the Malaysian side.

Though the reason for quitting the negotiation has been given, reason for the bridge cancelation is still a mystery. Hence, tomorrow's local papers will be of extraordinary interest. The Malaysian government must clear out the air.

Before tomorrow comes, I'd like to say, historical heritage is not a proper reason and I will not accept such incoherent reasoning.

As stated earlier, I'm for a bridge, straight or otherwise. And no, if there's still anybody that thinks the bridge would be a cul-de-sac, it is not. At the same time, I'm against bowing to Singaporean impossible demands. You could say, I'm being hawkish on this matter.

p/s - ReCom.org is down (again!) but it should be back up in less than a day.

pp/s - as if one disappointment is not enough, Malaysia lost 1 - 0 to Japan in Hockey World Cup Qualifier in Changzhou, China. This makes it hard for Malaysia to qualify for the World Cup.

ppp/s - the Prime Minister answers the mystery:

PUTRAJAYA, April 12 (Bernama) -- Malaysia decided to stop the construction of the "scenic bridge" meant to replace the Malaysian half of the Johor Causeway because of its legal implications and complications, said Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Wednesday.

The Prime Minister said the Cabinet deliberated on the project at its weekly meeting today and felt that there would still be legal implications and complications to resolve afterward should Malaysia proceed with the project.

"Problems will arise when we have to cut the causeway, the water pipes and railway track and connected them to the new bridge. The problems will continue," he told Bernama when asked to explain why Malaysia did not just build the bridge in its own territory without negotiating with Singapore.

So, does this mean we could only have a bridge in 2060 when the water contract ends?